↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Beyond GLMs: A Generative Mixture Modeling Approach to Neural System Identification

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Beyond GLMs: A Generative Mixture Modeling Approach to Neural System Identification
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003356
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas Theis, Andrè Maia Chagas, Daniel Arnstein, Cornelius Schwarz, Matthias Bethge

Abstract

Generalized linear models (GLMs) represent a popular choice for the probabilistic characterization of neural spike responses. While GLMs are attractive for their computational tractability, they also impose strong assumptions and thus only allow for a limited range of stimulus-response relationships to be discovered. Alternative approaches exist that make only very weak assumptions but scale poorly to high-dimensional stimulus spaces. Here we seek an approach which can gracefully interpolate between the two extremes. We extend two frequently used special cases of the GLM-a linear and a quadratic model-by assuming that the spike-triggered and non-spike-triggered distributions can be adequately represented using Gaussian mixtures. Because we derive the model from a generative perspective, its components are easy to interpret as they correspond to, for example, the spike-triggered distribution and the interspike interval distribution. The model is able to capture complex dependencies on high-dimensional stimuli with far fewer parameters than other approaches such as histogram-based methods. The added flexibility comes at the cost of a non-concave log-likelihood. We show that in practice this does not have to be an issue and the mixture-based model is able to outperform generalized linear and quadratic models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 6 5%
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 108 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 33%
Researcher 24 20%
Student > Master 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 7 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 32 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 27%
Engineering 13 11%
Computer Science 9 8%
Psychology 7 6%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 12 10%