↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Synaptic Plasticity in Neural Networks Needs Homeostasis with a Fast Rate Detector

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Synaptic Plasticity in Neural Networks Needs Homeostasis with a Fast Rate Detector
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Friedemann Zenke, Guillaume Hennequin, Wulfram Gerstner

Abstract

Hebbian changes of excitatory synapses are driven by and further enhance correlations between pre- and postsynaptic activities. Hence, Hebbian plasticity forms a positive feedback loop that can lead to instability in simulated neural networks. To keep activity at healthy, low levels, plasticity must therefore incorporate homeostatic control mechanisms. We find in numerical simulations of recurrent networks with a realistic triplet-based spike-timing-dependent plasticity rule (triplet STDP) that homeostasis has to detect rate changes on a timescale of seconds to minutes to keep the activity stable. We confirm this result in a generic mean-field formulation of network activity and homeostatic plasticity. Our results strongly suggest the existence of a homeostatic regulatory mechanism that reacts to firing rate changes on the order of seconds to minutes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 5 2%
United Kingdom 5 2%
United States 5 2%
Germany 4 2%
France 3 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 215 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 29%
Researcher 51 21%
Student > Master 35 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 26 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 59 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 19%
Physics and Astronomy 31 13%
Computer Science 20 8%
Engineering 20 8%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 36 15%