↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Simple Topological Features Reflect Dynamics and Modularity in Protein Interaction Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
Title
Simple Topological Features Reflect Dynamics and Modularity in Protein Interaction Networks
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuri Pritykin, Mona Singh

Abstract

The availability of large-scale protein-protein interaction networks for numerous organisms provides an opportunity to comprehensively analyze whether simple properties of proteins are predictive of the roles they play in the functional organization of the cell. We begin by re-examining an influential but controversial characterization of the dynamic modularity of the S. cerevisiae interactome that incorporated gene expression data into network analysis. We analyse the protein-protein interaction networks of five organisms, S. cerevisiae, H. sapiens, D. melanogaster, A. thaliana, and E. coli, and confirm significant and consistent functional and structural differences between hub proteins that are co-expressed with their interacting partners and those that are not, and support the view that the former tend to be intramodular whereas the latter tend to be intermodular. However, we also demonstrate that in each of these organisms, simple topological measures are significantly correlated with the average co-expression of a hub with its partners, independent of any classification, and therefore also reflect protein intra- and inter- modularity. Further, cross-interactomic analysis demonstrates that these simple topological characteristics of hub proteins tend to be conserved across organisms. Overall, we give evidence that purely topological features of static interaction networks reflect aspects of the dynamics and modularity of interactomes as well as previous measures incorporating expression data, and are a powerful means for understanding the dynamic roles of hubs in interactomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 75 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 25%
Researcher 21 25%
Student > Master 11 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 10%
Professor 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Computer Science 7 8%
Physics and Astronomy 6 7%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 10 12%