↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

ToPS: A Framework to Manipulate Probabilistic Models of Sequence Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
ToPS: A Framework to Manipulate Probabilistic Models of Sequence Data
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003234
Pubmed ID
Authors

André Yoshiaki Kashiwabara, Ígor Bonadio, Vitor Onuchic, Felipe Amado, Rafael Mathias, Alan Mitchell Durham

Abstract

Discrete Markovian models can be used to characterize patterns in sequences of values and have many applications in biological sequence analysis, including gene prediction, CpG island detection, alignment, and protein profiling. We present ToPS, a computational framework that can be used to implement different applications in bioinformatics analysis by combining eight kinds of models: (i) independent and identically distributed process; (ii) variable-length Markov chain; (iii) inhomogeneous Markov chain; (iv) hidden Markov model; (v) profile hidden Markov model; (vi) pair hidden Markov model; (vii) generalized hidden Markov model; and (viii) similarity based sequence weighting. The framework includes functionality for training, simulation and decoding of the models. Additionally, it provides two methods to help parameter setting: Akaike and Bayesian information criteria (AIC and BIC). The models can be used stand-alone, combined in Bayesian classifiers, or included in more complex, multi-model, probabilistic architectures using GHMMs. In particular the framework provides a novel, flexible, implementation of decoding in GHMMs that detects when the architecture can be traversed efficiently.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 19 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 9%