↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

‘HypothesisFinder:’ A Strategy for the Detection of Speculative Statements in Scientific Text

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
‘HypothesisFinder:’ A Strategy for the Detection of Speculative Statements in Scientific Text
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashutosh Malhotra, Erfan Younesi, Harsha Gurulingappa, Martin Hofmann-Apitius

Abstract

Speculative statements communicating experimental findings are frequently found in scientific articles, and their purpose is to provide an impetus for further investigations into the given topic. Automated recognition of speculative statements in scientific text has gained interest in recent years as systematic analysis of such statements could transform speculative thoughts into testable hypotheses. We describe here a pattern matching approach for the detection of speculative statements in scientific text that uses a dictionary of speculative patterns to classify sentences as hypothetical. To demonstrate the practical utility of our approach, we applied it to the domain of Alzheimer's disease and showed that our automated approach captures a wide spectrum of scientific speculations on Alzheimer's disease. Subsequent exploration of derived hypothetical knowledge leads to generation of a coherent overview on emerging knowledge niches, and can thus provide added value to ongoing research activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Netherlands 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Russia 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 82 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 7 7%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 24 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Engineering 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 13 13%