↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Models of Self-Peptide Sampling by Developing T Cells Identify Candidate Mechanisms of Thymic Selection

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Models of Self-Peptide Sampling by Developing T Cells Identify Candidate Mechanisms of Thymic Selection
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iren Bains, Hisse M. van Santen, Benedict Seddon, Andrew J. Yates

Abstract

Conventional and regulatory T cells develop in the thymus where they are exposed to samples of self-peptide MHC (pMHC) ligands. This probabilistic process selects for cells within a range of responsiveness that allows the detection of foreign antigen without excessive responses to self. Regulatory T cells are thought to lie at the higher end of the spectrum of acceptable self-reactivity and play a crucial role in the control of autoimmunity and tolerance to innocuous antigens. While many studies have elucidated key elements influencing lineage commitment, we still lack a full understanding of how thymocytes integrate signals obtained by sampling self-peptides to make fate decisions. To address this problem, we apply stochastic models of signal integration by T cells to data from a study quantifying the development of the two lineages using controllable levels of agonist peptide in the thymus. We find two models are able to explain the observations; one in which T cells continually re-assess fate decisions on the basis of multiple summed proximal signals from TCR-pMHC interactions; and another in which TCR sensitivity is modulated over time, such that contact with the same pMHC ligand may lead to divergent outcomes at different stages of development. Neither model requires that T(conv) and T(reg) are differentially susceptible to deletion or that the two lineages need qualitatively different signals for development, as have been proposed. We find additional support for the variable-sensitivity model, which is able to explain apparently paradoxical observations regarding the effect of partial and strong agonists on T(conv) and T(reg) development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 30%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 32%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 3 8%