↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Leveraging Prior Information to Detect Causal Variants via Multi-Variant Regression

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Leveraging Prior Information to Detect Causal Variants via Multi-Variant Regression
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003093
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nanye Long, Samuel P. Dickson, Jessica M. Maia, Hee Shin Kim, Qianqian Zhu, Andrew S. Allen

Abstract

Although many methods are available to test sequence variants for association with complex diseases and traits, methods that specifically seek to identify causal variants are less developed. Here we develop and evaluate a Bayesian hierarchical regression method that incorporates prior information on the likelihood of variant causality through weighting of variant effects. By simulation studies using both simulated and real sequence variants, we compared a standard single variant test for analyzing variant-disease association with the proposed method using different weighting schemes. We found that by leveraging linkage disequilibrium of variants with known GWAS signals and sequence conservation (phastCons), the proposed method provides a powerful approach for detecting causal variants while controlling false positives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 8%
Hong Kong 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 35 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Computer Science 5 13%
Mathematics 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 2 5%