↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Chapter 16: Text Mining for Translational Bioinformatics

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Chapter 16: Text Mining for Translational Bioinformatics
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003044
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Bretonnel Cohen, Lawrence E. Hunter

Abstract

Text mining for translational bioinformatics is a new field with tremendous research potential. It is a subfield of biomedical natural language processing that concerns itself directly with the problem of relating basic biomedical research to clinical practice, and vice versa. Applications of text mining fall both into the category of T1 translational research-translating basic science results into new interventions-and T2 translational research, or translational research for public health. Potential use cases include better phenotyping of research subjects, and pharmacogenomic research. A variety of methods for evaluating text mining applications exist, including corpora, structured test suites, and post hoc judging. Two basic principles of linguistic structure are relevant for building text mining applications. One is that linguistic structure consists of multiple levels. The other is that every level of linguistic structure is characterized by ambiguity. There are two basic approaches to text mining: rule-based, also known as knowledge-based; and machine-learning-based, also known as statistical. Many systems are hybrids of the two approaches. Shared tasks have had a strong effect on the direction of the field. Like all translational bioinformatics software, text mining software for translational bioinformatics can be considered health-critical and should be subject to the strictest standards of quality assurance and software testing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 242 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 21%
Researcher 51 19%
Student > Master 43 16%
Other 15 6%
Professor 14 5%
Other 55 21%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 24%
Computer Science 50 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 13%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 34 13%