↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Learning Multisensory Integration and Coordinate Transformation via Density Estimation

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Learning Multisensory Integration and Coordinate Transformation via Density Estimation
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph G. Makin, Matthew R. Fellows, Philip N. Sabes

Abstract

Sensory processing in the brain includes three key operations: multisensory integration-the task of combining cues into a single estimate of a common underlying stimulus; coordinate transformations-the change of reference frame for a stimulus (e.g., retinotopic to body-centered) effected through knowledge about an intervening variable (e.g., gaze position); and the incorporation of prior information. Statistically optimal sensory processing requires that each of these operations maintains the correct posterior distribution over the stimulus. Elements of this optimality have been demonstrated in many behavioral contexts in humans and other animals, suggesting that the neural computations are indeed optimal. That the relationships between sensory modalities are complex and plastic further suggests that these computations are learned-but how? We provide a principled answer, by treating the acquisition of these mappings as a case of density estimation, a well-studied problem in machine learning and statistics, in which the distribution of observed data is modeled in terms of a set of fixed parameters and a set of latent variables. In our case, the observed data are unisensory-population activities, the fixed parameters are synaptic connections, and the latent variables are multisensory-population activities. In particular, we train a restricted Boltzmann machine with the biologically plausible contrastive-divergence rule to learn a range of neural computations not previously demonstrated under a single approach: optimal integration; encoding of priors; hierarchical integration of cues; learning when not to integrate; and coordinate transformation. The model makes testable predictions about the nature of multisensory representations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Switzerland 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 186 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 32%
Researcher 44 21%
Student > Master 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 22 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 19%
Neuroscience 40 19%
Psychology 32 15%
Engineering 30 14%
Computer Science 17 8%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 29 14%