↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Systematic Prediction of Pharmacodynamic Drug-Drug Interactions through Protein-Protein-Interaction Network

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Systematic Prediction of Pharmacodynamic Drug-Drug Interactions through Protein-Protein-Interaction Network
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002998
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jialiang Huang, Chaoqun Niu, Christopher D. Green, Lun Yang, Hongkang Mei, Jing-Dong J. Han

Abstract

Identifying drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is a major challenge in drug development. Previous attempts have established formal approaches for pharmacokinetic (PK) DDIs, but there is not a feasible solution for pharmacodynamic (PD) DDIs because the endpoint is often a serious adverse event rather than a measurable change in drug concentration. Here, we developed a metric "S-score" that measures the strength of network connection between drug targets to predict PD DDIs. Utilizing known PD DDIs as golden standard positives (GSPs), we observed a significant correlation between S-score and the likelihood a PD DDI occurs. Our prediction was robust and surpassed existing methods as validated by two independent GSPs. Analysis of clinical side effect data suggested that the drugs having predicted DDIs have similar side effects. We further incorporated this clinical side effects evidence with S-score to increase the prediction specificity and sensitivity through a Bayesian probabilistic model. We have predicted 9,626 potential PD DDIs at the accuracy of 82% and the recall of 62%. Importantly, our algorithm provided opportunities for better understanding the potential molecular mechanisms or physiological effects underlying DDIs, as illustrated by the case studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Brazil 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 167 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 22%
Student > Master 33 18%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 4%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 28%
Computer Science 29 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 46 26%