↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Computational Biomarker Pipeline from Discovery to Clinical Implementation: Plasma Proteomic Biomarkers for Cardiac Transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Computational Biomarker Pipeline from Discovery to Clinical Implementation: Plasma Proteomic Biomarkers for Cardiac Transplantation
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002963
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriela V. Cohen Freue, Anna Meredith, Derek Smith, Axel Bergman, Mayu Sasaki, Karen K. Y. Lam, Zsuzsanna Hollander, Nina Opushneva, Mandeep Takhar, David Lin, Janet Wilson-McManus, Robert Balshaw, Paul A. Keown, Christoph H. Borchers, Bruce McManus, Raymond T. Ng, W. Robert McMaster, for the Biomarkers in Transplantation and the NCE CECR Prevention of Organ Failure Centre of Excellence Teams

Abstract

Recent technical advances in the field of quantitative proteomics have stimulated a large number of biomarker discovery studies of various diseases, providing avenues for new treatments and diagnostics. However, inherent challenges have limited the successful translation of candidate biomarkers into clinical use, thus highlighting the need for a robust analytical methodology to transition from biomarker discovery to clinical implementation. We have developed an end-to-end computational proteomic pipeline for biomarkers studies. At the discovery stage, the pipeline emphasizes different aspects of experimental design, appropriate statistical methodologies, and quality assessment of results. At the validation stage, the pipeline focuses on the migration of the results to a platform appropriate for external validation, and the development of a classifier score based on corroborated protein biomarkers. At the last stage towards clinical implementation, the main aims are to develop and validate an assay suitable for clinical deployment, and to calibrate the biomarker classifier using the developed assay. The proposed pipeline was applied to a biomarker study in cardiac transplantation aimed at developing a minimally invasive clinical test to monitor acute rejection. Starting with an untargeted screening of the human plasma proteome, five candidate biomarker proteins were identified. Rejection-regulated proteins reflect cellular and humoral immune responses, acute phase inflammatory pathways, and lipid metabolism biological processes. A multiplex multiple reaction monitoring mass-spectrometry (MRM-MS) assay was developed for the five candidate biomarkers and validated by enzyme-linked immune-sorbent (ELISA) and immunonephelometric assays (INA). A classifier score based on corroborated proteins demonstrated that the developed MRM-MS assay provides an appropriate methodology for an external validation, which is still in progress. Plasma proteomic biomarkers of acute cardiac rejection may offer a relevant post-transplant monitoring tool to effectively guide clinical care. The proposed computational pipeline is highly applicable to a wide range of biomarker proteomic studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Computer Science 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 15 19%