↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Dissection of Regulatory Networks that Are Altered in Disease via Differential Co-expression

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
citeulike
16 CiteULike
Title
Dissection of Regulatory Networks that Are Altered in Disease via Differential Co-expression
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002955
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Amar, Hershel Safer, Ron Shamir

Abstract

Comparing the gene-expression profiles of sick and healthy individuals can help in understanding disease. Such differential expression analysis is a well-established way to find gene sets whose expression is altered in the disease. Recent approaches to gene-expression analysis go a step further and seek differential co-expression patterns, wherein the level of co-expression of a set of genes differs markedly between disease and control samples. Such patterns can arise from a disease-related change in the regulatory mechanism governing that set of genes, and pinpoint dysfunctional regulatory networks. Here we present DICER, a new method for detecting differentially co-expressed gene sets using a novel probabilistic score for differential correlation. DICER goes beyond standard differential co-expression and detects pairs of modules showing differential co-expression. The expression profiles of genes within each module of the pair are correlated across all samples. The correlation between the two modules, however, differs markedly between the disease and normal samples. We show that DICER outperforms the state of the art in terms of significance and interpretability of the detected gene sets. Moreover, the gene sets discovered by DICER manifest regulation by disease-specific microRNA families. In a case study on Alzheimer's disease, DICER dissected biological processes and protein complexes into functional subunits that are differentially co-expressed, thereby revealing inner structures in disease regulatory networks.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 247 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 29%
Researcher 55 20%
Student > Master 37 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 5%
Student > Postgraduate 12 4%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 30 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 16%
Computer Science 30 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 5%
Engineering 10 4%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 42 16%