↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Chapter 15: Disease Gene Prioritization

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
Title
Chapter 15: Disease Gene Prioritization
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002902
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yana Bromberg

Abstract

Disease-causing aberrations in the normal function of a gene define that gene as a disease gene. Proving a causal link between a gene and a disease experimentally is expensive and time-consuming. Comprehensive prioritization of candidate genes prior to experimental testing drastically reduces the associated costs. Computational gene prioritization is based on various pieces of correlative evidence that associate each gene with the given disease and suggest possible causal links. A fair amount of this evidence comes from high-throughput experimentation. Thus, well-developed methods are necessary to reliably deal with the quantity of information at hand. Existing gene prioritization techniques already significantly improve the outcomes of targeted experimental studies. Faster and more reliable techniques that account for novel data types are necessary for the development of new diagnostics, treatments, and cure for many diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 3 1%
Netherlands 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
Spain 3 1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 239 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 29%
Researcher 61 23%
Student > Master 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 6%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 26 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 19%
Computer Science 39 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 7%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 38 14%