↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Significance Analysis of Prognostic Signatures

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Significance Analysis of Prognostic Signatures
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002875
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew H. Beck, Nicholas W. Knoblauch, Marco M. Hefti, Jennifer Kaplan, Stuart J. Schnitt, Aedin C. Culhane, Markus S. Schroeder, Thomas Risch, John Quackenbush, Benjamin Haibe-Kains

Abstract

A major goal in translational cancer research is to identify biological signatures driving cancer progression and metastasis. A common technique applied in genomics research is to cluster patients using gene expression data from a candidate prognostic gene set, and if the resulting clusters show statistically significant outcome stratification, to associate the gene set with prognosis, suggesting its biological and clinical importance. Recent work has questioned the validity of this approach by showing in several breast cancer data sets that "random" gene sets tend to cluster patients into prognostically variable subgroups. This work suggests that new rigorous statistical methods are needed to identify biologically informative prognostic gene sets. To address this problem, we developed Significance Analysis of Prognostic Signatures (SAPS) which integrates standard prognostic tests with a new prognostic significance test based on stratifying patients into prognostic subtypes with random gene sets. SAPS ensures that a significant gene set is not only able to stratify patients into prognostically variable groups, but is also enriched for genes showing strong univariate associations with patient prognosis, and performs significantly better than random gene sets. We use SAPS to perform a large meta-analysis (the largest completed to date) of prognostic pathways in breast and ovarian cancer and their molecular subtypes. Our analyses show that only a small subset of the gene sets found statistically significant using standard measures achieve significance by SAPS. We identify new prognostic signatures in breast and ovarian cancer and their corresponding molecular subtypes, and we show that prognostic signatures in ER negative breast cancer are more similar to prognostic signatures in ovarian cancer than to prognostic signatures in ER positive breast cancer. SAPS is a powerful new method for deriving robust prognostic biological signatures from clinically annotated genomic datasets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 102 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 15%
Computer Science 11 10%
Mathematics 4 4%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 17 15%