↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Guide to Enterotypes across the Human Body: Meta-Analysis of Microbial Community Structures in Human Microbiome Datasets

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
40 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
829 Mendeley
citeulike
12 CiteULike
Title
A Guide to Enterotypes across the Human Body: Meta-Analysis of Microbial Community Structures in Human Microbiome Datasets
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002863
Pubmed ID
Authors

Omry Koren, Dan Knights, Antonio Gonzalez, Levi Waldron, Nicola Segata, Rob Knight, Curtis Huttenhower, Ruth E. Ley

Abstract

Recent analyses of human-associated bacterial diversity have categorized individuals into 'enterotypes' or clusters based on the abundances of key bacterial genera in the gut microbiota. There is a lack of consensus, however, on the analytical basis for enterotypes and on the interpretation of these results. We tested how the following factors influenced the detection of enterotypes: clustering methodology, distance metrics, OTU-picking approaches, sequencing depth, data type (whole genome shotgun (WGS) vs.16S rRNA gene sequence data), and 16S rRNA region. We included 16S rRNA gene sequences from the Human Microbiome Project (HMP) and from 16 additional studies and WGS sequences from the HMP and MetaHIT. In most body sites, we observed smooth abundance gradients of key genera without discrete clustering of samples. Some body habitats displayed bimodal (e.g., gut) or multimodal (e.g., vagina) distributions of sample abundances, but not all clustering methods and workflows accurately highlight such clusters. Because identifying enterotypes in datasets depends not only on the structure of the data but is also sensitive to the methods applied to identifying clustering strength, we recommend that multiple approaches be used and compared when testing for enterotypes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 829 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 26 3%
Germany 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Other 12 1%
Unknown 768 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 208 25%
Researcher 201 24%
Student > Master 96 12%
Student > Bachelor 65 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 5%
Other 138 17%
Unknown 80 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 313 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 103 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 101 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 63 8%
Computer Science 26 3%
Other 109 13%
Unknown 114 14%