↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

ADEMA: An Algorithm to Determine Expected Metabolite Level Alterations Using Mutual Information

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
ADEMA: An Algorithm to Determine Expected Metabolite Level Alterations Using Mutual Information
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002859
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Ercument Cicek, Ilya Bederman, Leigh Henderson, Mitchell L. Drumm, Gultekin Ozsoyoglu

Abstract

Metabolomics is a relatively new "omics" platform, which analyzes a discrete set of metabolites detected in bio-fluids or tissue samples of organisms. It has been used in a diverse array of studies to detect biomarkers and to determine activity rates for pathways based on changes due to disease or drugs. Recent improvements in analytical methodology and large sample throughput allow for creation of large datasets of metabolites that reflect changes in metabolic dynamics due to disease or a perturbation in the metabolic network. However, current methods of comprehensive analyses of large metabolic datasets (metabolomics) are limited, unlike other "omics" approaches where complex techniques for analyzing coexpression/coregulation of multiple variables are applied. This paper discusses the shortcomings of current metabolomics data analysis techniques, and proposes a new multivariate technique (ADEMA) based on mutual information to identify expected metabolite level changes with respect to a specific condition. We show that ADEMA better predicts De Novo Lipogenesis pathway metabolite level changes in samples with Cystic Fibrosis (CF) than prediction based on the significance of individual metabolite level changes. We also applied ADEMA's classification scheme on three different cohorts of CF and wildtype mice. ADEMA was able to predict whether an unknown mouse has a CF or a wildtype genotype with 1.0, 0.84, and 0.9 accuracy for each respective dataset. ADEMA results had up to 31% higher accuracy as compared to other classification algorithms. In conclusion, ADEMA advances the state-of-the-art in metabolomics analysis, by providing accurate and interpretable classification results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
United Kingdom 2 4%
Denmark 2 4%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 45 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 29%
Researcher 14 25%
Student > Master 11 20%
Professor 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 41%
Computer Science 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 7 13%