↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Chapter 8: Biological Knowledge Assembly and Interpretation

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
Title
Chapter 8: Biological Knowledge Assembly and Interpretation
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002858
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ju Han Kim

Abstract

Most methods for large-scale gene expression microarray and RNA-Seq data analysis are designed to determine the lists of genes or gene products that show distinct patterns and/or significant differences. The most challenging and rate-liming step, however, is to determine what the resulting lists of genes and/or transcripts biologically mean. Biomedical ontology and pathway-based functional enrichment analysis is widely used to interpret the functional role of tightly correlated or differentially expressed genes. The groups of genes are assigned to the associated biological annotations using Gene Ontology terms or biological pathways and then tested if they are significantly enriched with the corresponding annotations. Unlike previous approaches, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis takes quite the reverse approach by using pre-defined gene sets. Differential co-expression analysis determines the degree of co-expression difference of paired gene sets across different conditions. Outcomes in DNA microarray and RNA-Seq data can be transformed into the graphical structure that represents biological semantics. A number of biomedical annotation and external repositories including clinical resources can be systematically integrated by biological semantics within the framework of concept lattice analysis. This array of methods for biological knowledge assembly and interpretation has been developed during the past decade and clearly improved our biological understanding of large-scale genomic data from the high-throughput technologies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Spain 3 2%
France 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 122 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 29%
Researcher 40 28%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 9%
Student > Master 12 8%
Other 9 6%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 6 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 10%
Computer Science 8 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 12 8%