↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Soft-bound Synaptic Plasticity Increases Storage Capacity

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Soft-bound Synaptic Plasticity Increases Storage Capacity
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002836
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark C. W. van Rossum, Maria Shippi, Adam B. Barrett

Abstract

Accurate models of synaptic plasticity are essential to understand the adaptive properties of the nervous system and for realistic models of learning and memory. Experiments have shown that synaptic plasticity depends not only on pre- and post-synaptic activity patterns, but also on the strength of the connection itself. Namely, weaker synapses are more easily strengthened than already strong ones. This so called soft-bound plasticity automatically constrains the synaptic strengths. It is known that this has important consequences for the dynamics of plasticity and the synaptic weight distribution, but its impact on information storage is unknown. In this modeling study we introduce an information theoretic framework to analyse memory storage in an online learning setting. We show that soft-bound plasticity increases a variety of performance criteria by about 18% over hard-bound plasticity, and likely maximizes the storage capacity of synapses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Germany 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 57 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 13 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 17%
Neuroscience 7 11%
Psychology 5 8%
Physics and Astronomy 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 8 13%