↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Chapter 2: Data-Driven View of Disease Biology

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
citeulike
12 CiteULike
Title
Chapter 2: Data-Driven View of Disease Biology
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002816
Pubmed ID
Authors

Casey S. Greene, Olga G. Troyanskaya

Abstract

Modern experimental strategies often generate genome-scale measurements of human tissues or cell lines in various physiological states. Investigators often use these datasets individually to help elucidate molecular mechanisms of human diseases. Here we discuss approaches that effectively weight and integrate hundreds of heterogeneous datasets to gene-gene networks that focus on a specific process or disease. Diverse and systematic genome-scale measurements provide such approaches both a great deal of power and a number of challenges. We discuss some such challenges as well as methods to address them. We also raise important considerations for the assessment and evaluation of such approaches. When carefully applied, these integrative data-driven methods can make novel high-quality predictions that can transform our understanding of the molecular-basis of human disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 5%
France 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 167 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 10%
Other 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 8 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 18%
Computer Science 24 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 16 8%