↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Integration of the Transcriptome and Glycome for Identification of Glycan Cell Signatures

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Integration of the Transcriptome and Glycome for Identification of Glycan Cell Signatures
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002813
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra V. Bennun, Kevin J. Yarema, Michael J. Betenbaugh, Frederick J. Krambeck

Abstract

Abnormalities in glycan biosynthesis have been conclusively linked to many diseases but the complexity of glycosylation has hindered the analysis of glycan data in order to identify glycoforms contributing to disease. To overcome this limitation, we developed a quantitative N-glycosylation model that interprets and integrates mass spectral and transcriptomic data by incorporating key glycosylation enzyme activities. Using the cancer progression model of androgen-dependent to androgen-independent Lymph Node Carcinoma of the Prostate (LNCaP) cells, the N-glycosylation model identified and quantified glycan structural details not typically derived from single-stage mass spectral or gene expression data. Differences between the cell types uncovered include increases in H(II) and Le(y) epitopes, corresponding to greater activity of α2-Fuc-transferase (FUT1) in the androgen-independent cells. The model further elucidated limitations in the two analytical platforms including a defect in the microarray for detecting the GnTV (MGAT5) enzyme. Our results demonstrate the potential of systems glycobiology tools for elucidating key glycan biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets. The integration of multiple data sets represents an important application of systems biology for understanding complex cellular processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 99 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 29%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 19%
Engineering 8 8%
Chemical Engineering 7 7%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 9 9%