↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

How Random Is Social Behaviour? Disentangling Social Complexity through the Study of a Wild House Mouse Population

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
How Random Is Social Behaviour? Disentangling Social Complexity through the Study of a Wild House Mouse Population
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002786
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Perony, Claudio J. Tessone, Barbara König, Frank Schweitzer

Abstract

Out of all the complex phenomena displayed in the behaviour of animal groups, many are thought to be emergent properties of rather simple decisions at the individual level. Some of these phenomena may also be explained by random processes only. Here we investigate to what extent the interaction dynamics of a population of wild house mice (Mus domesticus) in their natural environment can be explained by a simple stochastic model. We first introduce the notion of perceptual landscape, a novel tool used here to describe the utilisation of space by the mouse colony based on the sampling of individuals in discrete locations. We then implement the behavioural assumptions of the perceptual landscape in a multi-agent simulation to verify their accuracy in the reproduction of observed social patterns. We find that many high-level features--with the exception of territoriality--of our behavioural dataset can be accounted for at the population level through the use of this simplified representation. Our findings underline the potential importance of random factors in the apparent complexity of the mice's social structure. These results resonate in the general context of adaptive behaviour versus elementary environmental interactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 3 3%
United States 3 3%
Portugal 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 89 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 29%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Master 16 16%
Professor 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 44%
Physics and Astronomy 7 7%
Computer Science 5 5%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 14 14%