↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Modeling Dynamic Regulatory Processes in Stroke

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Modeling Dynamic Regulatory Processes in Stroke
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002722
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason E. McDermott, Kenneth Jarman, Ronald Taylor, Mary Lancaster, Harish Shankaran, Keri B. Vartanian, Susan L. Stevens, Mary P. Stenzel-Poore, Antonio Sanfilippo

Abstract

The ability to examine the behavior of biological systems in silico has the potential to greatly accelerate the pace of discovery in diseases, such as stroke, where in vivo analysis is time intensive and costly. In this paper we describe an approach for in silico examination of responses of the blood transcriptome to neuroprotective agents and subsequent stroke through the development of dynamic models of the regulatory processes observed in the experimental gene expression data. First, we identified functional gene clusters from these data. Next, we derived ordinary differential equations (ODEs) from the data relating these functional clusters to each other in terms of their regulatory influence on one another. Dynamic models were developed by coupling these ODEs into a model that simulates the expression of regulated functional clusters. By changing the magnitude of gene expression in the initial input state it was possible to assess the behavior of the networks through time under varying conditions since the dynamic model only requires an initial starting state, and does not require measurement of regulatory influences at each time point in order to make accurate predictions. We discuss the implications of our models on neuroprotection in stroke, explore the limitations of the approach, and report that an optimized dynamic model can provide accurate predictions of overall system behavior under several different neuroprotective paradigms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 7%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
Unknown 39 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 39%
Computer Science 10 23%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Engineering 2 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 6 14%