↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Predictive Dynamics of Human Pain Perception

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Predictive Dynamics of Human Pain Perception
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002719
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillermo A. Cecchi, Lejian Huang, Javeria Ali Hashmi, Marwan Baliki, María V. Centeno, Irina Rish, A. Vania Apkarian

Abstract

While the static magnitude of thermal pain perception has been shown to follow a power-law function of the temperature, its dynamical features have been largely overlooked. Due to the slow temporal experience of pain, multiple studies now show that the time evolution of its magnitude can be captured with continuous online ratings. Here we use such ratings to model quantitatively the temporal dynamics of thermal pain perception. We show that a differential equation captures the details of the temporal evolution in pain ratings in individual subjects for different stimulus pattern complexities, and also demonstrates strong predictive power to infer pain ratings, including readouts based only on brain functional images.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 100 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 18%
Neuroscience 17 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 11%
Computer Science 9 8%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 16 15%