↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Predicting the Extension of Biomedical Ontologies

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Predicting the Extension of Biomedical Ontologies
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002630
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catia Pesquita, Francisco M. Couto

Abstract

Developing and extending a biomedical ontology is a very demanding task that can never be considered complete given our ever-evolving understanding of the life sciences. Extension in particular can benefit from the automation of some of its steps, thus releasing experts to focus on harder tasks. Here we present a strategy to support the automation of change capturing within ontology extension where the need for new concepts or relations is identified. Our strategy is based on predicting areas of an ontology that will undergo extension in a future version by applying supervised learning over features of previous ontology versions. We used the Gene Ontology as our test bed and obtained encouraging results with average f-measure reaching 0.79 for a subset of biological process terms. Our strategy was also able to outperform state of the art change capturing methods. In addition we have identified several issues concerning prediction of ontology evolution, and have delineated a general framework for ontology extension prediction. Our strategy can be applied to any biomedical ontology with versioning, to help focus either manual or semi-automated extension methods on areas of the ontology that need extension.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
United States 2 5%
Unknown 40 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Chemistry 3 7%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 18%