↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Computing with Neural Synchrony

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Computing with Neural Synchrony
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002561
Pubmed ID
Authors

Romain Brette

Abstract

Neurons communicate primarily with spikes, but most theories of neural computation are based on firing rates. Yet, many experimental observations suggest that the temporal coordination of spikes plays a role in sensory processing. Among potential spike-based codes, synchrony appears as a good candidate because neural firing and plasticity are sensitive to fine input correlations. However, it is unclear what role synchrony may play in neural computation, and what functional advantage it may provide. With a theoretical approach, I show that the computational interest of neural synchrony appears when neurons have heterogeneous properties. In this context, the relationship between stimuli and neural synchrony is captured by the concept of synchrony receptive field, the set of stimuli which induce synchronous responses in a group of neurons. In a heterogeneous neural population, it appears that synchrony patterns represent structure or sensory invariants in stimuli, which can then be detected by postsynaptic neurons. The required neural circuitry can spontaneously emerge with spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Using examples in different sensory modalities, I show that this allows simple neural circuits to extract relevant information from realistic sensory stimuli, for example to identify a fluctuating odor in the presence of distractors. This theory of synchrony-based computation shows that relative spike timing may indeed have computational relevance, and suggests new types of neural network models for sensory processing with appealing computational properties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 4%
Germany 5 2%
United Kingdom 5 2%
France 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 254 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 33%
Researcher 63 22%
Student > Master 28 10%
Professor 16 6%
Student > Bachelor 15 5%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 29 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 25%
Neuroscience 62 21%
Computer Science 35 12%
Engineering 21 7%
Physics and Astronomy 17 6%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 36 12%