↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Optimizing Provider Recruitment for Influenza Surveillance Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Optimizing Provider Recruitment for Influenza Surveillance Networks
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002472
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel V. Scarpino, Nedialko B. Dimitrov, Lauren Ancel Meyers

Abstract

The increasingly complex and rapid transmission dynamics of many infectious diseases necessitates the use of new, more advanced methods for surveillance, early detection, and decision-making. Here, we demonstrate that a new method for optimizing surveillance networks can improve the quality of epidemiological information produced by typical provider-based networks. Using past surveillance and Internet search data, it determines the precise locations where providers should be enrolled. When applied to redesigning the provider-based, influenza-like-illness surveillance network (ILINet) for the state of Texas, the method identifies networks that are expected to significantly outperform the existing network with far fewer providers. This optimized network avoids informational redundancies and is thereby more effective than networks designed by conventional methods and a recently published algorithm based on maximizing population coverage. We show further that Google Flu Trends data, when incorporated into a network as a virtual provider, can enhance but not replace traditional surveillance methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 23%
Computer Science 8 11%
Mathematics 5 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 10 14%