↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

What Can Causal Networks Tell Us about Metabolic Pathways?

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
11 CiteULike
Title
What Can Causal Networks Tell Us about Metabolic Pathways?
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002458
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachael Hageman Blair, Daniel J. Kliebenstein, Gary A. Churchill

Abstract

Graphical models describe the linear correlation structure of data and have been used to establish causal relationships among phenotypes in genetic mapping populations. Data are typically collected at a single point in time. Biological processes on the other hand are often non-linear and display time varying dynamics. The extent to which graphical models can recapitulate the architecture of an underlying biological processes is not well understood. We consider metabolic networks with known stoichiometry to address the fundamental question: "What can causal networks tell us about metabolic pathways?". Using data from an Arabidopsis Bay[Formula: see text]Sha population and simulated data from dynamic models of pathway motifs, we assess our ability to reconstruct metabolic pathways using graphical models. Our results highlight the necessity of non-genetic residual biological variation for reliable inference. Recovery of the ordering within a pathway is possible, but should not be expected. Causal inference is sensitive to subtle patterns in the correlation structure that may be driven by a variety of factors, which may not emphasize the substrate-product relationship. We illustrate the effects of metabolic pathway architecture, epistasis and stochastic variation on correlation structure and graphical model-derived networks. We conclude that graphical models should be interpreted cautiously, especially if the implied causal relationships are to be used in the design of intervention strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 6%
Netherlands 3 2%
Germany 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Denmark 2 2%
Finland 2 2%
Singapore 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 98 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 22%
Student > Master 12 10%
Professor 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 10 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 50%
Computer Science 14 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 9%
Engineering 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 14 11%