↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Bonsai Trees in Your Head: How the Pavlovian System Sculpts Goal-Directed Choices by Pruning Decision Trees

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
324 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
480 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
Title
Bonsai Trees in Your Head: How the Pavlovian System Sculpts Goal-Directed Choices by Pruning Decision Trees
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002410
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quentin J. M. Huys, Neir Eshel, Elizabeth O'Nions, Luke Sheridan, Peter Dayan, Jonathan P. Roiser

Abstract

When planning a series of actions, it is usually infeasible to consider all potential future sequences; instead, one must prune the decision tree. Provably optimal pruning is, however, still computationally ruinous and the specific approximations humans employ remain unknown. We designed a new sequential reinforcement-based task and showed that human subjects adopted a simple pruning strategy: during mental evaluation of a sequence of choices, they curtailed any further evaluation of a sequence as soon as they encountered a large loss. This pruning strategy was Pavlovian: it was reflexively evoked by large losses and persisted even when overwhelmingly counterproductive. It was also evident above and beyond loss aversion. We found that the tendency towards Pavlovian pruning was selectively predicted by the degree to which subjects exhibited sub-clinical mood disturbance, in accordance with theories that ascribe Pavlovian behavioural inhibition, via serotonin, a role in mood disorders. We conclude that Pavlovian behavioural inhibition shapes highly flexible, goal-directed choices in a manner that may be important for theories of decision-making in mood disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 480 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 12 3%
United States 10 2%
Germany 7 1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 438 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 141 29%
Researcher 88 18%
Student > Master 57 12%
Student > Bachelor 33 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 5%
Other 67 14%
Unknown 69 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 136 28%
Neuroscience 78 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 10%
Computer Science 47 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 4%
Other 60 13%
Unknown 92 19%