↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Efficient Sparse Coding in Early Sensory Processing: Lessons from Signal Recovery

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Efficient Sparse Coding in Early Sensory Processing: Lessons from Signal Recovery
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002372
Pubmed ID
Authors

András Lörincz, Zsolt Palotai, Gábor Szirtes

Abstract

Sensory representations are not only sparse, but often overcomplete: coding units significantly outnumber the input units. For models of neural coding this overcompleteness poses a computational challenge for shaping the signal processing channels as well as for using the large and sparse representations in an efficient way. We argue that higher level overcompleteness becomes computationally tractable by imposing sparsity on synaptic activity and we also show that such structural sparsity can be facilitated by statistics based decomposition of the stimuli into typical and atypical parts prior to sparse coding. Typical parts represent large-scale correlations, thus they can be significantly compressed. Atypical parts, on the other hand, represent local features and are the subjects of actual sparse coding. When applied on natural images, our decomposition based sparse coding model can efficiently form overcomplete codes and both center-surround and oriented filters are obtained similar to those observed in the retina and the primary visual cortex, respectively. Therefore we hypothesize that the proposed computational architecture can be seen as a coherent functional model of the first stages of sensory coding in early vision.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 4%
Germany 2 3%
Switzerland 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 63 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 29%
Researcher 21 29%
Student > Master 12 16%
Professor 4 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 27%
Computer Science 14 19%
Engineering 11 15%
Psychology 6 8%
Physics and Astronomy 4 5%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 3 4%