↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Using Functional Signatures to Identify Repositioned Drugs for Breast, Myelogenous Leukemia and Prostate Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
Title
Using Functional Signatures to Identify Repositioned Drugs for Breast, Myelogenous Leukemia and Prostate Cancer
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daichi Shigemizu, Zhenjun Hu, Jui-Hung Hung, Chia-Ling Huang, Yajie Wang, Charles DeLisi

Abstract

The cost and time to develop a drug continues to be a major barrier to widespread distribution of medication. Although the genomic revolution appears to have had little impact on this problem, and might even have exacerbated it because of the flood of additional and usually ineffective leads, the emergence of high throughput resources promises the possibility of rapid, reliable and systematic identification of approved drugs for originally unintended uses. In this paper we develop and apply a method for identifying such repositioned drug candidates against breast cancer, myelogenous leukemia and prostate cancer by looking for inverse correlations between the most perturbed gene expression levels in human cancer tissue and the most perturbed expression levels induced by bioactive compounds. The method uses variable gene signatures to identify bioactive compounds that modulate a given disease. This is in contrast to previous methods that use small and fixed signatures. This strategy is based on the observation that diseases stem from failed/modified cellular functions, irrespective of the particular genes that contribute to the function, i.e., this strategy targets the functional signatures for a given cancer. This function-based strategy broadens the search space for the effective drugs with an impressive hit rate. Among the 79, 94 and 88 candidate drugs for breast cancer, myelogenous leukemia and prostate cancer, 32%, 13% and 17% respectively are either FDA-approved/in-clinical-trial drugs, or drugs with suggestive literature evidences, with an FDR of 0.01. These findings indicate that the method presented here could lead to a substantial increase in efficiency in drug discovery and development, and has potential application for the personalized medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 6%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 104 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 22%
Researcher 24 21%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 28 25%
Unknown 7 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 14%
Computer Science 14 12%
Chemistry 7 6%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 17 15%