↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Second Order Dimensionality Reduction Using Minimum and Maximum Mutual Information Models

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Second Order Dimensionality Reduction Using Minimum and Maximum Mutual Information Models
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002249
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey D. Fitzgerald, Ryan J. Rowekamp, Lawrence C. Sincich, Tatyana O. Sharpee

Abstract

Conventional methods used to characterize multidimensional neural feature selectivity, such as spike-triggered covariance (STC) or maximally informative dimensions (MID), are limited to Gaussian stimuli or are only able to identify a small number of features due to the curse of dimensionality. To overcome these issues, we propose two new dimensionality reduction methods that use minimum and maximum information models. These methods are information theoretic extensions of STC that can be used with non-Gaussian stimulus distributions to find relevant linear subspaces of arbitrary dimensionality. We compare these new methods to the conventional methods in two ways: with biologically-inspired simulated neurons responding to natural images and with recordings from macaque retinal and thalamic cells responding to naturalistic time-varying stimuli. With non-Gaussian stimuli, the minimum and maximum information methods significantly outperform STC in all cases, whereas MID performs best in the regime of low dimensional feature spaces.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 8%
Germany 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 93 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 36%
Researcher 34 32%
Student > Master 7 7%
Professor 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 35%
Neuroscience 20 19%
Engineering 12 11%
Physics and Astronomy 9 8%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 6 6%