↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Most Random Gene Expression Signatures Are Significantly Associated with Breast Cancer Outcome

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
76 X users
patent
9 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
7 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
506 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
702 Mendeley
citeulike
31 CiteULike
Title
Most Random Gene Expression Signatures Are Significantly Associated with Breast Cancer Outcome
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002240
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Venet, Jacques E. Dumont, Vincent Detours

Abstract

Bridging the gap between animal or in vitro models and human disease is essential in medical research. Researchers often suggest that a biological mechanism is relevant to human cancer from the statistical association of a gene expression marker (a signature) of this mechanism, that was discovered in an experimental system, with disease outcome in humans. We examined this argument for breast cancer. Surprisingly, we found that gene expression signatures-unrelated to cancer-of the effect of postprandial laughter, of mice social defeat and of skin fibroblast localization were all significantly associated with breast cancer outcome. We next compared 47 published breast cancer outcome signatures to signatures made of random genes. Twenty-eight of them (60%) were not significantly better outcome predictors than random signatures of identical size and 11 (23%) were worst predictors than the median random signature. More than 90% of random signatures >100 genes were significant outcome predictors. We next derived a metagene, called meta-PCNA, by selecting the 1% genes most positively correlated with proliferation marker PCNA in a compendium of normal tissues expression. Adjusting breast cancer expression data for meta-PCNA abrogated almost entirely the outcome association of published and random signatures. We also found that, in the absence of adjustment, the hazard ratio of outcome association of a signature strongly correlated with meta-PCNA (R(2) = 0.9). This relation also applied to single-gene expression markers. Moreover, >50% of the breast cancer transcriptome was correlated with meta-PCNA. A corollary was that purging cell cycle genes out of a signature failed to rule out the confounding effect of proliferation. Hence, it is questionable to suggest that a mechanism is relevant to human breast cancer from the finding that a gene expression marker for this mechanism predicts human breast cancer outcome, because most markers do. The methods we present help to overcome this problem.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 702 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 34 5%
United Kingdom 11 2%
Germany 9 1%
Canada 5 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Other 23 3%
Unknown 608 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 192 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 170 24%
Student > Master 57 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 45 6%
Student > Bachelor 40 6%
Other 128 18%
Unknown 70 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 281 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 125 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 81 12%
Computer Science 63 9%
Engineering 10 1%
Other 51 7%
Unknown 91 13%