↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Protein Networks as Logic Functions in Development and Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
citeulike
30 CiteULike
Title
Protein Networks as Logic Functions in Development and Cancer
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002180
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janusz Dutkowski, Trey Ideker

Abstract

Many biological and clinical outcomes are based not on single proteins, but on modules of proteins embedded in protein networks. A fundamental question is how the proteins within each module contribute to the overall module activity. Here, we study the modules underlying three representative biological programs related to tissue development, breast cancer metastasis, or progression of brain cancer, respectively. For each case we apply a new method, called Network-Guided Forests, to identify predictive modules together with logic functions which tie the activity of each module to the activity of its component genes. The resulting modules implement a diverse repertoire of decision logic which cannot be captured using the simple approximations suggested in previous work such as gene summation or subtraction. We show that in cancer, certain combinations of oncogenes and tumor suppressors exert competing forces on the system, suggesting that medical genetics should move beyond cataloguing individual cancer genes to cataloguing their combinatorial logic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 6%
France 4 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Nigeria 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 228 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 31%
Researcher 80 30%
Student > Master 20 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 6%
Other 15 6%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 14 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 146 54%
Computer Science 45 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 21 8%