↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Computational Approach to Finding Novel Targets for Existing Drugs

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
citeulike
11 CiteULike
Title
A Computational Approach to Finding Novel Targets for Existing Drugs
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne Y. Li, Jianghong An, Steven J. M. Jones

Abstract

Repositioning existing drugs for new therapeutic uses is an efficient approach to drug discovery. We have developed a computational drug repositioning pipeline to perform large-scale molecular docking of small molecule drugs against protein drug targets, in order to map the drug-target interaction space and find novel interactions. Our method emphasizes removing false positive interaction predictions using criteria from known interaction docking, consensus scoring, and specificity. In all, our database contains 252 human protein drug targets that we classify as reliable-for-docking as well as 4621 approved and experimental small molecule drugs from DrugBank. These were cross-docked, then filtered through stringent scoring criteria to select top drug-target interactions. In particular, we used MAPK14 and the kinase inhibitor BIM-8 as examples where our stringent thresholds enriched the predicted drug-target interactions with known interactions up to 20 times compared to standard score thresholds. We validated nilotinib as a potent MAPK14 inhibitor in vitro (IC50 40 nM), suggesting a potential use for this drug in treating inflammatory diseases. The published literature indicated experimental evidence for 31 of the top predicted interactions, highlighting the promising nature of our approach. Novel interactions discovered may lead to the drug being repositioned as a therapeutic treatment for its off-target's associated disease, added insight into the drug's mechanism of action, and added insight into the drug's side effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 5%
Germany 4 2%
France 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 187 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 25%
Other 14 6%
Student > Master 13 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 5%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 21 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 37%
Chemistry 22 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 9%
Computer Science 18 8%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 28 13%