| Title |
Optimal Stimulus Shapes for Neuronal Excitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002089 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel B. Forger, David Paydarfar, John R. Clay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| Russia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 9% |
| Germany | 4 | 6% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 26% |
| Researcher | 14 | 21% |
| Professor | 7 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 30% |
| Engineering | 10 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 12% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |