↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Effects of Heterogeneous and Clustered Contact Patterns on Infectious Disease Dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Effects of Heterogeneous and Clustered Contact Patterns on Infectious Disease Dynamics
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, June 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik M. Volz, Joel C. Miller, Alison Galvani, Lauren Ancel Meyers

Abstract

The spread of infectious diseases fundamentally depends on the pattern of contacts between individuals. Although studies of contact networks have shown that heterogeneity in the number of contacts and the duration of contacts can have far-reaching epidemiological consequences, models often assume that contacts are chosen at random and thereby ignore the sociological, temporal and/or spatial clustering of contacts. Here we investigate the simultaneous effects of heterogeneous and clustered contact patterns on epidemic dynamics. To model population structure, we generalize the configuration model which has a tunable degree distribution (number of contacts per node) and level of clustering (number of three cliques). To model epidemic dynamics for this class of random graph, we derive a tractable, low-dimensional system of ordinary differential equations that accounts for the effects of network structure on the course of the epidemic. We find that the interaction between clustering and the degree distribution is complex. Clustering always slows an epidemic, but simultaneously increasing clustering and the variance of the degree distribution can increase final epidemic size. We also show that bond percolation-based approximations can be highly biased if one incorrectly assumes that infectious periods are homogeneous, and the magnitude of this bias increases with the amount of clustering in the network. We apply this approach to model the high clustering of contacts within households, using contact parameters estimated from survey data of social interactions, and we identify conditions under which network models that do not account for household structure will be biased.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 4%
United States 4 2%
Australia 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 163 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 31%
Researcher 49 27%
Student > Master 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Student > Bachelor 8 4%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 15 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 21%
Mathematics 33 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 13%
Computer Science 12 7%
Engineering 10 6%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 32 18%