↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Accurate Quantification of Functional Analogy among Close Homologs

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Accurate Quantification of Functional Analogy among Close Homologs
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001074
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria D. Chikina, Olga G. Troyanskaya

Abstract

Correctly evaluating functional similarities among homologous proteins is necessary for accurate transfer of experimental knowledge from one organism to another, and is of particular importance for the development of animal models of human disease. While the fact that sequence similarity implies functional similarity is a fundamental paradigm of molecular biology, sequence comparison does not directly assess the extent to which two proteins participate in the same biological processes, and has limited utility for analyzing families with several parologous members. Nevertheless, we show that it is possible to provide a cross-organism functional similarity measure in an unbiased way through the exclusive use of high-throughput gene-expression data. Our methodology is based on probabilistic cross-species mapping of functionally analogous proteins based on Bayesian integrative analysis of gene expression compendia. We demonstrate that even among closely related genes, our method is able to predict functionally analogous homolog pairs better than relying on sequence comparison alone. We also demonstrate that the landscape of functional similarity is often complex and that definitive "functional orthologs" do not always exist. Even in these cases, our method and the online interface we provide are designed to allow detailed exploration of sources of inferred functional similarity that can be evaluated by the user.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 11%
Brazil 2 3%
Belgium 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 59 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 34%
Professor 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 18%
Computer Science 9 13%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 3 4%