↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Incremental Mutual Information: A New Method for Characterizing the Strength and Dynamics of Connections in Neuronal Circuits

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Incremental Mutual Information: A New Method for Characterizing the Strength and Dynamics of Connections in Neuronal Circuits
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abhinav Singh, Nicholas A. Lesica

Abstract

Understanding the computations performed by neuronal circuits requires characterizing the strength and dynamics of the connections between individual neurons. This characterization is typically achieved by measuring the correlation in the activity of two neurons. We have developed a new measure for studying connectivity in neuronal circuits based on information theory, the incremental mutual information (IMI). By conditioning out the temporal dependencies in the responses of individual neurons before measuring the dependency between them, IMI improves on standard correlation-based measures in several important ways: 1) it has the potential to disambiguate statistical dependencies that reflect the connection between neurons from those caused by other sources (e.g. shared inputs or intrinsic cellular or network mechanisms) provided that the dependencies have appropriate timescales, 2) for the study of early sensory systems, it does not require responses to repeated trials of identical stimulation, and 3) it does not assume that the connection between neurons is linear. We describe the theory and implementation of IMI in detail and demonstrate its utility on experimental recordings from the primate visual system.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 7%
United Kingdom 4 3%
Germany 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Japan 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 101 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 33%
Researcher 33 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 11%
Student > Master 11 9%
Professor 8 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 3 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 47%
Engineering 16 13%
Computer Science 14 11%
Neuroscience 12 10%
Mathematics 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 4 3%