↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

On the Inverse Problem of Binocular 3D Motion Perception

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
On the Inverse Problem of Binocular 3D Motion Perception
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000999
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Lages, Suzanne Heron

Abstract

It is shown that existing processing schemes of 3D motion perception such as interocular velocity difference, changing disparity over time, as well as joint encoding of motion and disparity, do not offer a general solution to the inverse optics problem of local binocular 3D motion. Instead we suggest that local velocity constraints in combination with binocular disparity and other depth cues provide a more flexible framework for the solution of the inverse problem. In the context of the aperture problem we derive predictions from two plausible default strategies: (1) the vector normal prefers slow motion in 3D whereas (2) the cyclopean average is based on slow motion in 2D. Predicting perceived motion directions for ambiguous line motion provides an opportunity to distinguish between these strategies of 3D motion processing. Our theoretical results suggest that velocity constraints and disparity from feature tracking are needed to solve the inverse problem of 3D motion perception. It seems plausible that motion and disparity input is processed in parallel and integrated late in the visual processing hierarchy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 9%
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 43 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 20%
Computer Science 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 2 4%