↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Accurate Distinction of Pathogenic from Benign CNVs in Mental Retardation

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Accurate Distinction of Pathogenic from Benign CNVs in Mental Retardation
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000752
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jayne Y. Hehir-Kwa, Nienke Wieskamp, Caleb Webber, Rolph Pfundt, Han G. Brunner, Christian Gilissen, Bert B. A. de Vries, Chris P. Ponting, Joris A. Veltman

Abstract

Copy number variants (CNVs) have recently been recognized as a common form of genomic variation in humans. Hundreds of CNVs can be detected in any individual genome using genomic microarrays or whole genome sequencing technology, but their phenotypic consequences are still poorly understood. Rare CNVs have been reported as a frequent cause of neurological disorders such as mental retardation (MR), schizophrenia and autism, prompting widespread implementation of CNV screening in diagnostics. In previous studies we have shown that, in contrast to benign CNVs, MR-associated CNVs are significantly enriched in genes whose mouse orthologues, when disrupted, result in a nervous system phenotype. In this study we developed and validated a novel computational method for differentiating between benign and MR-associated CNVs using structural and functional genomic features to annotate each CNV. In total 13 genomic features were included in the final version of a Naïve Bayesian Tree classifier, with LINE density and mouse knock-out phenotypes contributing most to the classifier's accuracy. After demonstrating that our method (called GECCO) perfectly classifies CNVs causing known MR-associated syndromes, we show that it achieves high accuracy (94%) and negative predictive value (99%) on a blinded test set of more than 1,200 CNVs from a large cohort of individuals with MR. These results indicate that this classification method will be of value for objectively prioritizing CNVs in clinical research and diagnostics.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 2%
Japan 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 113 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 22%
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Master 14 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Professor 8 6%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 12%
Computer Science 5 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 20 16%