Title |
Structural Characteristics of Novel Protein Folds
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2010
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000750 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes, Joseph M. Dybas, Andras Fiser |
Abstract |
Folds are the basic building blocks of protein structures. Understanding the emergence of novel protein folds is an important step towards understanding the rules governing the evolution of protein structure and function and for developing tools for protein structure modeling and design. We explored the frequency of occurrences of an exhaustively classified library of supersecondary structural elements (Smotifs), in protein structures, in order to identify features that would define a fold as novel compared to previously known structures. We found that a surprisingly small set of Smotifs is sufficient to describe all known folds. Furthermore, novel folds do not require novel Smotifs, but rather are a new combination of existing ones. Novel folds can be typified by the inclusion of a relatively higher number of rarely occurring Smotifs in their structures and, to a lesser extent, by a novel topological combination of commonly occurring Smotifs. When investigating the structural features of Smotifs, we found that the top 10% of most frequent ones have a higher fraction of internal contacts, while some of the most rare motifs are larger, and contain a longer loop region. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 7% |
Canada | 2 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 105 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 32% |
Researcher | 39 | 31% |
Professor | 8 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 14% |
Unknown | 7 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 51% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 22% |
Computer Science | 13 | 10% |
Engineering | 3 | 2% |
Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 6% |