↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Predicting Odor Pleasantness with an Electronic Nose

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Predicting Odor Pleasantness with an Electronic Nose
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000740
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafi Haddad, Abebe Medhanie, Yehudah Roth, David Harel, Noam Sobel

Abstract

A primary goal for artificial nose (eNose) technology is to report perceptual qualities of novel odors. Currently, however, eNoses primarily detect and discriminate between odorants they previously "learned". We tuned an eNose to human odor pleasantness estimates. We then used the eNose to predict the pleasantness of novel odorants, and tested these predictions in naïve subjects who had not participated in the tuning procedure. We found that our apparatus generated odorant pleasantness ratings with above 80% similarity to average human ratings, and with above 90% accuracy at discriminating between categorically pleasant or unpleasant odorants. Similar results were obtained in two cultures, native Israeli and native Ethiopian, without retuning of the apparatus. These findings suggest that unlike in vision and audition, in olfaction there is a systematic predictable link between stimulus structure and stimulus pleasantness. This goes in contrast to the popular notion that odorant pleasantness is completely subjective, and may provide a new method for odor screening and environmental monitoring, as well as a critical building block for digital transmission of smell.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 149 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 16%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Professor 10 6%
Other 36 22%
Unknown 32 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 27 16%
Engineering 22 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 13%
Neuroscience 12 7%
Chemistry 9 5%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 42 26%