↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Statistical Methods for Detecting Differentially Abundant Features in Clinical Metagenomic Samples

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1107 Mendeley
citeulike
27 CiteULike
Title
Statistical Methods for Detecting Differentially Abundant Features in Clinical Metagenomic Samples
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000352
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Robert White, Niranjan Nagarajan, Mihai Pop

Abstract

Numerous studies are currently underway to characterize the microbial communities inhabiting our world. These studies aim to dramatically expand our understanding of the microbial biosphere and, more importantly, hope to reveal the secrets of the complex symbiotic relationship between us and our commensal bacterial microflora. An important prerequisite for such discoveries are computational tools that are able to rapidly and accurately compare large datasets generated from complex bacterial communities to identify features that distinguish them.We present a statistical method for comparing clinical metagenomic samples from two treatment populations on the basis of count data (e.g. as obtained through sequencing) to detect differentially abundant features. Our method, Metastats, employs the false discovery rate to improve specificity in high-complexity environments, and separately handles sparsely-sampled features using Fisher's exact test. Under a variety of simulations, we show that Metastats performs well compared to previously used methods, and significantly outperforms other methods for features with sparse counts. We demonstrate the utility of our method on several datasets including a 16S rRNA survey of obese and lean human gut microbiomes, COG functional profiles of infant and mature gut microbiomes, and bacterial and viral metabolic subsystem data inferred from random sequencing of 85 metagenomes. The application of our method to the obesity dataset reveals differences between obese and lean subjects not reported in the original study. For the COG and subsystem datasets, we provide the first statistically rigorous assessment of the differences between these populations. The methods described in this paper are the first to address clinical metagenomic datasets comprising samples from multiple subjects. Our methods are robust across datasets of varied complexity and sampling level. While designed for metagenomic applications, our software can also be applied to digital gene expression studies (e.g. SAGE). A web server implementation of our methods and freely available source code can be found at http://metastats.cbcb.umd.edu/.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 35 3%
United Kingdom 10 <1%
Brazil 9 <1%
France 8 <1%
Germany 7 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Other 21 2%
Unknown 1000 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 284 26%
Researcher 260 23%
Student > Master 137 12%
Student > Bachelor 61 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 57 5%
Other 175 16%
Unknown 133 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 494 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 130 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 57 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 5%
Environmental Science 53 5%
Other 151 14%
Unknown 165 15%