↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Organization of Excitable Dynamics in Hierarchical Biological Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
Title
Organization of Excitable Dynamics in Hierarchical Biological Networks
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000190
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Müller-Linow, Claus C. Hilgetag, Marc-Thorsten Hütt

Abstract

This study investigates the contributions of network topology features to the dynamic behavior of hierarchically organized excitable networks. Representatives of different types of hierarchical networks as well as two biological neural networks are explored with a three-state model of node activation for systematically varying levels of random background network stimulation. The results demonstrate that two principal topological aspects of hierarchical networks, node centrality and network modularity, correlate with the network activity patterns at different levels of spontaneous network activation. The approach also shows that the dynamic behavior of the cerebral cortical systems network in the cat is dominated by the network's modular organization, while the activation behavior of the cellular neuronal network of Caenorhabditis elegans is strongly influenced by hub nodes. These findings indicate the interaction of multiple topological features and dynamic states in the function of complex biological networks.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 10 4%
United States 7 3%
Germany 4 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Hungary 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 194 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 23%
Student > Master 23 10%
Professor 18 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 7%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 15 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 26%
Physics and Astronomy 31 14%
Neuroscience 27 12%
Computer Science 22 10%
Engineering 16 7%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 30 13%