↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Computational Methods for Protein Identification from Mass Spectrometry Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Computational Methods for Protein Identification from Mass Spectrometry Data
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, February 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0040012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leo McHugh, Jonathan W Arthur

Abstract

Protein identification using mass spectrometry is an indispensable computational tool in the life sciences. A dramatic increase in the use of proteomic strategies to understand the biology of living systems generates an ongoing need for more effective, efficient, and accurate computational methods for protein identification. A wide range of computational methods, each with various implementations, are available to complement different proteomic approaches. A solid knowledge of the range of algorithms available and, more critically, the accuracy and effectiveness of these techniques is essential to ensure as many of the proteins as possible, within any particular experiment, are correctly identified. Here, we undertake a systematic review of the currently available methods and algorithms for interpreting, managing, and analyzing biological data associated with protein identification. We summarize the advances in computational solutions as they have responded to corresponding advances in mass spectrometry hardware. The evolution of scoring algorithms and metrics for automated protein identification are also discussed with a focus on the relative performance of different techniques. We also consider the relative advantages and limitations of different techniques in particular biological contexts. Finally, we present our perspective on future developments in the area of computational protein identification by considering the most recent literature on new and promising approaches to the problem as well as identifying areas yet to be explored and the potential application of methods from other areas of computational biology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 195 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 23%
Researcher 43 20%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 30 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 14%
Computer Science 25 11%
Chemistry 14 6%
Engineering 12 5%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 30 14%