↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Synchronization-Induced Rhythmicity of Circadian Oscillators in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
193 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Synchronization-Induced Rhythmicity of Circadian Oscillators in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030068
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel Bernard, Didier Gonze, Branka Čajavec, Hanspeter Herzel, Achim Kramer

Abstract

The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) host a robust, self-sustained circadian pacemaker that coordinates physiological rhythms with the daily changes in the environment. Neuronal clocks within the SCN form a heterogeneous network that must synchronize to maintain timekeeping activity. Coherent circadian output of the SCN tissue is established by intercellular signaling factors, such as vasointestinal polypeptide. It was recently shown that besides coordinating cells, the synchronization factors play a crucial role in the sustenance of intrinsic cellular rhythmicity. Disruption of intercellular signaling abolishes sustained rhythmicity in a majority of neurons and desynchronizes the remaining rhythmic neurons. Based on these observations, the authors propose a model for the synchronization of circadian oscillators that combines intracellular and intercellular dynamics at the single-cell level. The model is a heterogeneous network of circadian neuronal oscillators where individual oscillators are damped rather than self-sustained. The authors simulated different experimental conditions and found that: (1) in normal, constant conditions, coupled circadian oscillators quickly synchronize and produce a coherent output; (2) in large populations, such oscillators either synchronize or gradually lose rhythmicity, but do not run out of phase, demonstrating that rhythmicity and synchrony are codependent; (3) the number of oscillators and connectivity are important for these synchronization properties; (4) slow oscillators have a higher impact on the period in mixed populations; and (5) coupled circadian oscillators can be efficiently entrained by light-dark cycles. Based on these results, it is predicted that: (1) a majority of SCN neurons needs periodic synchronization signal to be rhythmic; (2) a small number of neurons or a low connectivity results in desynchrony; and (3) amplitudes and phases of neurons are negatively correlated. The authors conclude that to understand the orchestration of timekeeping in the SCN, intracellular circadian clocks cannot be isolated from their intercellular communication components.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 211 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 23%
Researcher 44 19%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Student > Master 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 31 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 7%
Neuroscience 15 6%
Physics and Astronomy 14 6%
Other 52 22%
Unknown 40 17%