↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Improving the Caenorhabditis elegans Genome Annotation Using Machine Learning

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Improving the Caenorhabditis elegans Genome Annotation Using Machine Learning
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, February 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gunnar Rätsch, Sören Sonnenburg, Jagan Srinivasan, Hanh Witte, Klaus-R Müller, Ralf-J Sommer, Bernhard Schölkopf

Abstract

For modern biology, precise genome annotations are of prime importance, as they allow the accurate definition of genic regions. We employ state-of-the-art machine learning methods to assay and improve the accuracy of the genome annotation of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. The proposed machine learning system is trained to recognize exons and introns on the unspliced mRNA, utilizing recent advances in support vector machines and label sequence learning. In 87% (coding and untranslated regions) and 95% (coding regions only) of all genes tested in several out-of-sample evaluations, our method correctly identified all exons and introns. Notably, only 37% and 50%, respectively, of the presently unconfirmed genes in the C. elegans genome annotation agree with our predictions, thus we hypothesize that a sizable fraction of those genes are not correctly annotated. A retrospective evaluation of the Wormbase WS120 annotation [] of C. elegans reveals that splice form predictions on unconfirmed genes in WS120 are inaccurate in about 18% of the considered cases, while our predictions deviate from the truth only in 10%-13%. We experimentally analyzed 20 controversial genes on which our system and the annotation disagree, confirming the superiority of our predictions. While our method correctly predicted 75% of those cases, the standard annotation was never completely correct. The accuracy of our system is further corroborated by a comparison with two other recently proposed systems that can be used for splice form prediction: SNAP and ExonHunter. We conclude that the genome annotation of C. elegans and other organisms can be greatly enhanced using modern machine learning technology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 7%
Germany 4 4%
Russia 2 2%
Norway 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 80 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Other 8 8%
Professor 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 32%
Computer Science 26 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Engineering 6 6%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 14 14%