↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Modeling Somatic Evolution in Tumorigenesis

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
Title
Modeling Somatic Evolution in Tumorigenesis
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2006
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabrina L Spencer, Ryan A Gerety, Kenneth J Pienta, Stephanie Forrest

Abstract

Tumorigenesis in humans is thought to be a multistep process where certain mutations confer a selective advantage, allowing lineages derived from the mutated cell to outcompete other cells. Although molecular cell biology has substantially advanced cancer research, our understanding of the evolutionary dynamics that govern tumorigenesis is limited. This paper analyzes the computational implications of cancer progression presented by Hanahan and Weinberg in The Hallmarks of Cancer. We model the complexities of tumor progression as a small set of underlying rules that govern the transformation of normal cells to tumor cells. The rules are implemented in a stochastic multistep model. The model predicts that (i) early-onset cancers proceed through a different sequence of mutation acquisition than late-onset cancers; (ii) tumor heterogeneity varies with acquisition of genetic instability, mutation pathway, and selective pressures during tumorigenesis; (iii) there exists an optimal initial telomere length which lowers cancer incidence and raises time of cancer onset; and (iv) the ability to initiate angiogenesis is an important stage-setting mutation, which is often exploited by other cells. The model offers insight into how the sequence of acquired mutations affects the timing and cellular makeup of the resulting tumor and how the cellular-level population dynamics drive neoplastic evolution.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 148 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 8%
Student > Master 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 20 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 9%
Engineering 11 7%
Mathematics 9 5%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 25 15%