RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
RT @DrAliziAlias: Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA p…
Arah pandangan mata tiada kaitan dengan penipuan. Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) adalah pseudopsikologi. Sahabat RA pun tidak tahu siapa orang munafik. Huzaifah al-Yamani tahu pun sebab Nabi Muhammad SAW beritahu (berdasarkan wahyu). Itu pun disimpan.
Demostrado por los científicos de la Universidad de Örebro, Suecia; los patrones del iris se ven determinados por los mismos genes que forman el lóbulo central del cerebro, una parte que afecta a la conducta y la personalidad de cada uno. https://t.co/GOw9
@direllac12 Not sure what's going on with the demon guy, but the 'glancing to the side indicates someone is lying' bit has been debunked. https://t.co/WMEr2vXFVL
It doesn't work on psychotic leprechauns and window DOWN #ExecutiveOrder12949 #FuckingBillyBadass!!! BECAUSE..."WE want this PLAN to work." -THE PLAN™ https://t.co/Jb4FnwEGcW
@JimmyJConway @Chrikatchu https://t.co/xVzD1nq7H7 Ich bin mit dir einig, dass er da ziemlich mit sich kämpft. Aber es reicht ja schon, wenn man zuhört, was er sagt. Er gibt keine Antworten, sondern erzählt einfach irgendwas. Fast das ganze Video ist so. Er
@DavidNdii notice how her eyes go left and right whenever she lies. your pr team is amateur AF...https://t.co/DXyfVV9HTz.
@DavidNdii notice how her eyes go left and right whenever she lies😂😂your pr team is amateur AF "https://t.co/hSxR6LOovg https://t.co/DXyfVV9HTz.
@netanyahu BODY LANGUAGE: notice how he avoids eye contact while speaking to the person? that's what a LIAR @netanyahu does! the study: https://t.co/7tJeFINW0v https://t.co/BI8MwqP8sF
@ChaunceyGardner You're safe Charles. Eye movement is not a reliable truth detector. https://t.co/TK8ZRUoMxN https://t.co/Ed5qpm89SW
@GotPickup If you base your lying detection on some NLP research done in 70ies, I have bad news for you: https://t.co/eyzV2QRHMh It is an urban legend.
RT @alexconnerbham: @ElaineMcgreevy @Shona_Mu "You must do eye contact though or you won't be able to know what people are thinking." Almo…
@ElaineMcgreevy @Shona_Mu "You must do eye contact though or you won't be able to know what people are thinking." Almost all Science: Being able to read people from eye contact is a myth https://t.co/3XdTqZ7J3H
@CroneWitch_51 @Davidlaz Best I can do. :) https://t.co/cvRAZSkHZx
@MarilynRMarks1 @jennycohn1 @CoalitionGoodGv He can’t escape his give…honestly, look how many times (& what he’s saying when he does it) he looks up to his right. He’s a liar & it’s so disgraceful. https://t.co/56bTEh0zDx
RT @adrianolmedo: @PsicolibriDR Éste es un paper bastante clásico ya, en donde se desmiente lo de los ojos en PNL en que si se mueve para u…
@PsicolibriDR Éste es un paper bastante clásico ya, en donde se desmiente lo de los ojos en PNL en que si se mueve para un lado es porque estás recordando imágenes y para otro lado si estás imaginando https://t.co/UNHnoGJfMZ
@vr_sam @OlivierJT_SU It seems, though I wonder if in the future skin response might be measured from the forehead or hands. (NOT advocating for this… just a little paranoid) https://t.co/0EdtHmI0uq
RT @mindshelp: Liars make more eye contact to appear more honest and truthful. Study Link - https://t.co/naLNp4U5ty #Facts #psychology #F…
Liars make more eye contact to appear more honest and truthful. Study Link - https://t.co/naLNp4U5ty #Facts #psychology #FactsMatter #FactCheck https://t.co/x5eG9tk64R
@scary_dude @Buildingtrouble @MythinformedMKE Not the mention, studies... https://t.co/wBbThqrOPo
@backtolife_2022 Person’s eye-movements can reveal a useful insight into whether they are lying or telling the truth. According to this notion, looking up to the right is indicative of lying whereas looking up to their left suggests they are telling the tr
RT @metodogolo: En esto también ha caído la programación neurolingüística, que dice que el engaño se puede detectar al rastrear los movimie…
En esto también ha caído la programación neurolingüística, que dice que el engaño se puede detectar al rastrear los movimientos oculares, cosa que ha sido ampliamente desacreditada https://t.co/eRp0W7Ufbv
لمن يبحث عن الدليل ! ورقة علميه لبروف ريتشارد وايزمان لفضح زعومات البرمجة اللغوية العصبية ،، وللذين يدعون بأن هناك ادله علميه تثبت nlp.. احضرو لنا الادله بحث علمي محكم مثل 👇🏽👇🏽هذا ...
@mashi_kmah @haymhkme11 Full paper by richard wisman 、 i bring it to you 👉🏽 read it carefully if you care about scientific evidence !! .. https://t.co/vZpiTvcoFG. Good luck
@mashi_kmah @haymhkme11 وهنا ايضاً بحث للبروفيسر ريتشارد وايز مان ،الذي قام بفضح ادعاءات الNLP ,, اقرأ بحثه جيداً ... لديه اوراق علميه محكمه قام بنشرها https://t.co/hR7Fko0pQd
RT @RichardWiseman: Our paper debunking NLP claims re lying is now most viewed on PLoS site, with 20,000 views http://t.co/JGsYBpzS Open so…
@Sundancer_UK @jobaumber @GMB @susannareid100 Yeah that’s a myth. I studied psychology at uni and it’s a widespread idea that’s been debunked. Feel free to read about it here https://t.co/mrk9tYKW4S
@JaggedStar1 @AltNatSecAgency You’re wrong but keep believing that: https://t.co/ERv92uco2U
@Sites4Congress He's probably lying, but that idea has been thoroughly debunked: https://t.co/hRGdDPWO2W
RT @NotEvenRoman: @Sites4Congress The eye thing has been debunked https://t.co/Jt1dZo2VMk but he is fidgeting quite a bit so it's quite lik…
@Sites4Congress That's a myth that comes from the NLP stuff in the 1970s, so I hope you didn't convict anyone on the basis of the direction they were looking. https://t.co/BZgsLHVhMu
RT @NotEvenRoman: @Sites4Congress The eye thing has been debunked https://t.co/Jt1dZo2VMk but he is fidgeting quite a bit so it's quite lik…
RT @NotEvenRoman: @Sites4Congress The eye thing has been debunked https://t.co/Jt1dZo2VMk but he is fidgeting quite a bit so it's quite lik…
@Sites4Congress The eye thing has been debunked https://t.co/Jt1dZo2VMk but he is fidgeting quite a bit so it's quite likely he's lying.
RT @RichardWiseman: Our paper debunking NLP claims re lying is now most viewed on PLoS site, with 20,000 views http://t.co/JGsYBpzS Open so…
Per the poll: there’s no universal tell Watch someone’s face and create a baseline of their nonverbal movements, then see if their eyes shift when they possibly lie. If they do, is it a pattern? Deviation from that baseline could be a tell for deception
MANY of the @educo_world #cult recruiters have spent a LOT OF TIME AND MONEY on WORTHLESS NLP courses. So much of the original material under the NLP umbrella,because it's not a discipline but a product,has been proven NONSENSE over the years.UTTER TWADDLE
Muchos piensan que se puede saber si alguien está mintiendo solo con observar si mira hacia la derecha o hacia la izquierda. Sin embargo, un artículo publicado en la revista PLoS ONE concluyó en que esta creencia sostenida por la PNL es infundada https://t
The amount of shit I get for calling people out for trying to use the direction someone is looking as evidence for lying is astounding considering how long it's been proven to be completely unreliable. Thank you @navarrotells for also speaking truth about
RT @navarrotells: The eyes DON'T have it - https://t.co/nJDcr48Kba
10000% Agree
RT @navarrotells: The eyes DON'T have it - https://t.co/nJDcr48Kba
The eyes DON'T have it - https://t.co/nJDcr48Kba
@JoshLotusEaters Interesting, thanks. Just did a bit more reading and the phenomena I'm talking about was based in NLP - it was tested by Richard Wiseman in 2012 and found to be bunk. https://t.co/NHRSMx5wUU
RT @collegraphy: Periodic reminder that yes there are studies of NLP eye movement evaluations and no it cannot identify dishonesty https:/…
Periodic reminder that yes there are studies of NLP eye movement evaluations and no it cannot identify dishonesty https://t.co/O99g0X7xpc
Exempelvis att en individ som ljuger ska se upp till höger medan en som talar sanning ska se upp till vänster. https://t.co/6D8mafTTVB
The Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming None of the analyses showed significant confidence in the results https://t.co/hlMpOIUtv4 https://t.co/e99c85Z8Zq
RT @Vitorstandup: Pistas Oculares já foram cientificamente invalidadas em 2012: https://t.co/DQ2bIg8b60, As marcas de fisiognomonia foram i…
@2LarryJohnson7 If only this wasn't total nonsense. https://t.co/WatQKxQ4ee
@RealCryptoRambo @TX_WalkerRanger That was debunked in 2012. https://t.co/CV0XuFRfQA 🙄
RT @lexistentiaI: @KHiveQueenBee this is 100% pseudoscience. zero evidence to support this. its first origins were from a detective show, n…
RT @lexistentiaI: @KHiveQueenBee this is 100% pseudoscience. zero evidence to support this. its first origins were from a detective show, n…
RT @lexistentiaI: @KHiveQueenBee this is 100% pseudoscience. zero evidence to support this. its first origins were from a detective show, n…
@FranMuroMu ... tu cerebro esta realizando un construcción Visual (algo nuevo/invento), por lo que podríamos argumentar, que ella al mirar 2 o 3 veces hacia arriba la derecha estaría mintiendo. Pero este argumento es aceptado por algunos y considerado un m
@many_trails @squnto @Jordan_Sather_ I just picked the easiest one for you. Here’s more https://t.co/WY1BM5fqY0
@iamapjm @Jiminssiiii12 @def__JIMIN yeah I mean google seems to be beyond you as well as actual research but here https://t.co/aq3tK9pjvS
@tsvph1 @actualjackryan @JoyceWhiteVance How is something proven to be nonsense 'a factor'. It isn't about perfection, it is about the fact that it doesn't work. At all. It is rubbish. https://t.co/y7OALaysxR
@GuffyNicola @Nck_Wbb @JoyceWhiteVance @PaulEkman A hypothesis isn't tested. It is what you test. A theory is based on testing. And this isn't about 'tells', nor is it about my belief. It is about research and nonsense like this. Here: https://t.co/y7OAL
@WyattDerpy @JoyceWhiteVance Here you go https://t.co/y7OALaysxR
@JoyceWhiteVance Newsflash - this has been scientifically disproven. Is there still time to return that law degree? https://t.co/FFluLZ286J
@RealityWonk @JoyceWhiteVance maybe *you* should do some research https://t.co/ubDgM4wv91
@JoyceWhiteVance The results provide considerable grounds to be skeptical of the notion that the proposed patterns of eye-movements provide a reliable indicator of lying. https://t.co/Q38LaJjgGv
@PaulStewartII @JoyceWhiteVance If you don't want to bother looking at all the other responses people have made with studies, you can start here. https://t.co/xdTVlITZgl
"The Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming" in PLOS One https://t.co/2WDRcaB097
@JoyceWhiteVance It's a bit more complicated. Research does not bear this out. Examples of research: T. Levine (2018) International Journal of Communication and https://t.co/mQMP5MgEdZ