Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals http://t.co/5IfChL0aXe

Scientific value of #systematic #reviews: survey of editors of core clinical journals (2012) http://t.co/K4qWuIzGi3

Scientific value of #systematic #reviews: survey of editors of core clinical journals (2012) http://t.co/K4qWuIzGi3

Core clinical journal eds consider SRs "original research" - Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews http://t.co/pzZ2XszPbi #PLOSONE

Core clinical journal eds consider SRs "original research" - Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews http://t.co/pzZ2XszPbi #PLOSONE

Support for systematic reviews as research "editors of most core clinical journals consider SRs original research" http://t.co/aSNvy7aCit

Currently, the editors of most core clinical journals consider SRs original research. http://t.co/erE4lGYLSx

Support for systematic reviews as research "editors of most core clinical journals consider SRs original research" http://t.co/aSNvy7aCit

Support for systematic reviews as research "editors of most core clinical journals consider SRs original research" http://t.co/aSNvy7aCit

Support for systematic reviews as research "editors of most core clinical journals consider SRs original research" http://t.co/aSNvy7aCit

RT @hildabast: Yikes, is that still a thing? Too many journal editors don't think a systematic review is original research http://t.co/f ...

Yikes, is that still a thing? Too many journal editors don't think a systematic review is original research http://t.co/fAu2Q6aY #EBM